I was never a Harrods

girl. I went and looked and came away. I recall from the dim and distant past that the first thing I ever bought in Harrods was dusters for my sister, hardly a Harrods shopper. She wanted the dusters but I wanted the bag.
Though I have lived in London ( except for 2 years in New York) forever, I don’t know it like the back of my hand (which has changed anyway). I know certain areas but they change, coming in and out of focus depending upon importance or relevance. London

was always a vast city, including or excluding this or that depending upon your opinion. And I have lived in the built up bits, not in the suburbs. I like it.
Yes I hate the mess but the mess is everywhere, a psychological condition which clearly indicates the low level distress in which many of us operate, many without knowledge or insight, guarded by the phrase banned in my family home – “don’t care.” I do. Hence AR ragpicker – 14 pieces in the street on the way to the bus.

Nothing to do with garbage disposal. Thoughtless people.
Last week, as part of using my renewed health and strength again, I went to my old favourite, Harvey Nichols. No I never bought “everything” there, I did a lot of looking because it was worth looking at – what they had, how it was offered to me. As good as a gallery.
Sadly – and I don’t bore easily – it was boring. Layout to contents, I didn’t like what was on offer. I saw a lovely evening dress for which I have no use and not another thing that lingered in the memory, up to and including labels I admire. The several staff members to whom I spoke were agreeable. So it’s not them. It’s just all wrong.

And not a thing you could afford if you weren’t laden with money – there should always be something – so you can have the bag and the illusion of being part of it.
Maybe, I hear you say, the time is wrong ? If you are worrying about the gas bill, you are not in the market for higher end ready-to-wear. But you know, a cat can look at a king.

And maybe even admire the ermine trimming … Just not there. So I was interested to see Mary Portas talking about its putative sale and what’s necessary to move it forward from stuck in oh dear.
She came to HN from Topshop where she had notable success and it was hoped she could do the same again. And she did. But this is all retrospective – it’s about what was. Is what is, so different ? She notes in her comments. that 70 per cent of Generation Z would rather shop in a physical store than on-line. I’ve always wondered about buying on line – cut. line, length, colour, shape, contents, suitability – and that weary business of sending it back if it isn’t right.
I have been lucky on line (the stonking success of the first jeans I bought for years, from Land’s End, modest price, perfect fit and the nicest woman on the phone when I rang to say thank you) and very very wary. Not much, not often but then I was never at any age or with any money, a shop every week girl. Shopping AR was targeted.

I could always be sidetracked – but I did not go out to wander and window shop aimlessly.
I do realise this is about as far from Harvey Nichols as you can get and being the next best thing to a nun -just me – I haven’t even touched on menswear – though I tried to buy interesting coloured socks for a present and was sent elsewhere by the assistant.
People have different relationships with clothes, as they have different relationships with people. They feel differently about shopping. They don’t know what they think, they are covered – in the cheap and it’ll do, to the expensive because it’s fashionable , because some “influencer” says so. Modern shopping is the victim of the confusion that exists between “me, me, me” and “who ?” In an unhealthy time I’d rather invoke rodent than ripoff.

- Aesop’s fable of The Town Mouse and the Country Mouse
































































